Local Preference in Florida Public Procurement

Posted · Add Comment

Generally, public works construction projects must be procured by  competitive bidding. Fla. Stat. 255.20(1).  However, the requirement for competitive bidding in Fla. Stat. 255.20 does not prohibit application of any small-business or disadvantaged-business enterprise program or any local-preference ordinance.Fla Stat. 255.20(i).

Local Preference ordinances are used by governmental entities to help local businesses obtain public work, based in part on the belief that helping local business will stimulate the local economy and keep the public funds used for the project local. In addition to local preference ordinances, many entities also provide bidding preferences to minority owned or women owned businesses.

The implementation of local preference ordinances in public procurement is a source of much contention for many reasons.  It costs significant time and money for a firm to review, complete, and submit a bid for a public project. So when a low bidder is not awarded the project because of a local preference ordinance, a challenge  may likely ensue.

Such ordinances have been challenged on constitutional grounds and for violating public policy which favors awarding contracts to the lowest bidder.   Depending on the provisions in place in each local preference ordinace will determine its legality.

Florida Law

In the absence of public policy established by some prohibition in the state or federal constitutions, or in a state statute, including the charter of the city, the determination of whether or not a local bidding preference, such as is given by the above ordinance, is, or is not, in the best interests of the city, is a purely legislative decision to be made by the legislative branch of the city by ordinance, and should not be overturned by the judicial branch of government. See

Federal Funding

Federal funding of a project does not automatically prohibit the application of a local preference. One must look at the specific congressional mandate for such funds or the rules of the agency providing the funding. The U.S. Department of Transportation does not permit the application of local preference in jobs its funding.

See United Bldg. and Const. Trades Council of Camden County and Vicinity v. Mayor City of Cleveland v. Ohio, 508 F.3d 827 (2007), It is true that Congress has not prohibited the imposition of local hiring preferences on federally funded highway projects. As discussed above, that limitation has resulted from the agency’s interpretation of the statute mandating competitive bidding procedures.”

For an analysis of local preference ordinances in the context of Equal Protection and Due Process constitutional concerns see American Law Reports Article: Validity, construction, and effect of requirement under state statute or local preference ordinance giving local or locally qualified contractors a percentage preference in determinin lowest bids, 89 A.L.R. 4th 587 (1991).

An Example of  a Local Preference Ordinance

Broward County – Local Preference Ordinance from the Broward County Procurement Code

 

 

Sec. 1-75. Local preference; procedure.
Except where otherwise provided by federal or state law or other funding source restrictions, purchases of goods, general services, or professional services under the Procurement Code shall give preference to local businesses in the following manner:
(a) Under a competitive bid solicitation, when a responsive, responsible non-local business submits the lowest price bid, and the bid submitted by one or more responsive, responsible local businesses is within ten percent (10%) of the price submitted by the non-local business, then that non-local business and each of the aforementioned responsive, responsible local businesses shall have the opportunity to submit, within five (5) working days of notice of intent to award, a best and final bid equal to or lower than the amount of the low bid previously submitted by the non-local business. Contract award shall be made to the responsive, responsible business submitting the lowest best and final bid. In the case of a tie in the best and final bid between a local business and a non-local business, contract award shall be made to the local business.
(b) For all other competitive solicitations in which objective factors used to evaluate the responses from vendors are assigned point totals, if, upon the completion of final rankings (technical and price combined, if applicable) by the selection committee, a non-local business is the highest ranked proposer and the ranking of a local proposer is within five percent (5%) of the ranking obtained by the non-local proposer, the highest ranked local proposer shall have the opportunity to proceed to negotiations with the county.
(c) If a tie occurs between two (2) or more local businesses, then the tie may be broken using the tie breaker criteria in the Procurement Code.
(Ord. No. 92-14, § 2, 5-12-92; Ord. No. 2002-19, § 1, 5-28-02; Ord. No. 2004-29, 8-24-04)

 

Article by: Andrew Douglas, Esq., Andrew Douglas, P.A., 954.474.4420

Andrew Douglas, P.A., A Florida Construction Law Attorney , and Florida Commercial Litigation Attorney . We are a construction and commercial litigation and law practice for the South Florida construction and business community located in Broward County, Florida. Our litigation attorneys and lawyers handle construction and commercial cases all over the State of Florida. Click here to learn more about Attorney Andrew Douglas and his experience and qualifications. Andrew is a 2003 graduate of the University of Florida College of Law and College of Business with a Masters of Science in Business Administration - Finance. Call today to speak to an attorney today, and get started on your case. Andrew Douglas, Esq. is a Florida Licensed Real Estate Broker operating as Eagle One Realty Co., and Realtor for Weston , Florida and the surrounding area.

Andrew Douglas, P.A. 2014 Florida Construction Law Attorney and Lawyer